Publication Abstracts
Sanderson et al. 2025
Sanderson, B.M., V. Brovkin, R.A. Fisher, D. Hohn, T. Ilyina, C.D. Jones, T. Koenigk, C. Koven, H. Li, D.M. Lawrence, P. Lawrence, S. Liddicoat, A.H. Macdougall, N. Mengis, Z. Nicholls, E. O'Rourke, , M. Sandstad, J. Schwinger, R. Seférian, L.T. Sentman, I.R. Simpson, C. Smith, N.J. Steinert, A.L.S. Swann, J. Tjiputra, and T. Ziehn, 2025: flat10MIP: An emissions-driven experiment to diagnose the climate response to positive, zero, and negative CO2 emissions. Geosci. Model Dev., 18, no. 17, 5699-5724, doi:10.5194/gmd-18-5699-2025.
The proportionality between global mean temperature and cumulative emissions of CO2 predicted in Earth system models (ESMs) is the foundation of carbon budgeting frameworks. Deviations from this behavior could impact estimates of required net-zero timings and negative emissions requirements to meet the Paris Agreement climate targets. However, existing ESM diagnostic experiments do not allow for direct estimation of these deviations as a function of defined emissions pathways. Here, we perform a set of climate model diagnostic experiments for the assessment of transient climate response to cumulative CO2 emissions (TCRE), the Zero Emissions Commitment (ZEC), and climate reversibility metrics in an emissions-driven framework. The emissions-driven experiments provide consistent independent variables simplifying simulation, analysis and interpretation, with emissions rates more comparable to recent levels than existing protocols using model-specific compatible emissions from the CMIP DECK 1pctCO2 experiment, where emissions rates tend to increase during the experiment, such that at the time of CO2 doubling in year 70, emissions are much greater than present-day values. A base experiment, "esm-flat10", has constant emissions of CO2 of 10 GtC per year (near-present-day values), and initial results show that the TCRE estimated in this experiment is about 0.1 K less than that obtained using 1pctCO2. A subset of ESMs exhibit land carbon sinks that saturate during this experiment. A branch experiment, esm-flat10-zec, illustrates that both positive and negative ZEC effects are less pronounced under esm-flat10 than under 1pctCO2 — the magnitude of ZEC50 in ESMs is, on average, reduced by 30% compared with 1pctCO2 branch experiments. A final experiment, esm-flat10-cdr, assesses climate reversibility under negative emissions, where we find that peak warming may occur before or after net zero and that the asymmetry in temperature at a given level of cumulative emissions between the positive and negative emissions phases is well described by ZEC in most models. Further, we find that existing probabilistic simple climate model (SCM) ensembles tend to overestimate temperature reversibility compared with ESMs, highlighting the need for additional constraints. We propose a set of climate diagnostic indicators to quantify various aspects of climate reversibility. These experiments were suggested as potential candidates in CMIP7 and have since been adopted as "fast track" simulations.
Export citation: [ BibTeX ] [ RIS ]
BibTeX Citation
@article{sa02500a,
author={Sanderson, B. M. and Brovkin, V. and Fisher, R. A. and Hohn, D. and Ilyina, T. and Jones, C. D. and Koenigk, T. and Koven, C. and Li, H. and Lawrence, D. M. and Lawrence, P. and Liddicoat, S. and Macdougall, A. H. and Mengis, N. and Nicholls, Z. and O'Rourke, E. and Romanou, A. and Sandstad, M. and Schwinger, J. and Seférian, R. and Sentman, L. T. and Simpson, I. R. and Smith, C. and Steinert, N. J. and Swann, A. L. S. and Tjiputra, J. and Ziehn, T.},
title={flat10MIP: An emissions-driven experiment to diagnose the climate response to positive, zero, and negative CO2 emissions},
year={2025},
journal={Geoscientific Model Development},
volume={18},
number={17},
pages={5699--5724},
doi={10.5194/gmd-18-5699-2025},
}
[ Close ]
RIS Citation
TY - JOUR ID - sa02500a AU - Sanderson, B. M. AU - Brovkin, V. AU - Fisher, R. A. AU - Hohn, D. AU - Ilyina, T. AU - Jones, C. D. AU - Koenigk, T. AU - Koven, C. AU - Li, H. AU - Lawrence, D. M. AU - Lawrence, P. AU - Liddicoat, S. AU - Macdougall, A. H. AU - Mengis, N. AU - Nicholls, Z. AU - O'Rourke, E. AU - Romanou, A. AU - Sandstad, M. AU - Schwinger, J. AU - Seférian, R. AU - Sentman, L. T. AU - Simpson, I. R. AU - Smith, C. AU - Steinert, N. J. AU - Swann, A. L. S. AU - Tjiputra, J. AU - Ziehn, T. PY - 2025 TI - flat10MIP: An emissions-driven experiment to diagnose the climate response to positive, zero, and negative CO2 emissions JA - Geosci. Model Dev. JO - Geoscientific Model Development VL - 18 IS - 17 SP - 5699 EP - 5724 DO - 10.5194/gmd-18-5699-2025 ER -
[ Close ]

